My blog has moved! Redirecting…

You should be automatically redirected. If not, visit goodbadandunread and update your bookmarks.

My Reviews
Guest Author Schedule
EBUZZ: It's What's for Dinner!
Don't You Want to E-review Too?
Author Interviews
  • comingsoon - Karen Kelley
  • comingsoon - Caroline Linden
  • comingsoon Avon Red: Sylvia Day, Toni Blake, Cathryn Fox, Leda Swann, Delilah Devlin
  • Authors in Blogland
    Reader Blogs
    Author Blogs
    About Me
    My Photo
    Location: Texas, United States

    The Good, The Bad, and the Unread
    Previous Posts
    Recent Comments
    Reading and Reviewing
    Upcoming Books
    This and That
    Count Bar
    eXTReMe Tracker

    I still don't get it
    I looks like Wicked Pleasure by Nina Bangs now has a Feb 2007 release date. And there are two new covers that I can find on the net but all seem to have the same cover quotes as the one that was pulled in July.

    Amazon has this one
    Books a Million has this one

    Personally I don't care for any of them but none seem worth the cost of pulling a book... anyone hear anything else about this?

    Labels: ,

    1. Oooohhhhh- I likey that second one!! He's one fine model me thinks!!

      By Blogger Kristie (J), at 11/25/2006 03:28:00 PM  

    2. The new one is the mass market release for February, the one pulled was the trade release.

      By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11/25/2006 03:45:00 PM  

    3. hmmmm

      Well the first book was trade but even if they wanted a MM release vs trade would it make sense to leave the trade out there vs pulling it?

      LOL kristie, it remains me of My Wicked Pirate's cover.

      Not that it really matters, I have the book so all is well with the world *eg*

      By Blogger sybil, at 11/25/2006 04:16:00 PM  

    4. I'm not loving either of these, but they're both better than the original trade cover. That one was hideous. Like you, I figured the original trade got pulled because of the quote but someone (can't remember who) said the problem was the cover art not the quote. Since the quote is on this version as well, I'm guessing the cover really was the issue. Maybe the publisher didn't have the right to the original art...?

      By Anonymous hkdimon, at 11/26/2006 12:48:00 AM  

    5. Well, the first cover that was pulled looks a lot like Kevin Federline-- yuck. Maybe he objected?

      By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11/26/2006 08:34:00 AM  

    6. I agree about the original cover. Actually, it was a cover that I sent to my editor of what I really, really hoped my cover would not be like.

      Same as HelenKay, the only thing I've heard is that there was some problem with the rights to the artwork.

      By Blogger meljean brook, at 11/28/2006 04:49:00 PM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home